According to the authoritativereport, the number of college student is growth, while the quality is not asgood as before. In the meantime, whether students perform badly should fail thecourse have spoken much debate? Some assert that school should not be sodesperate, just turning a blind eye to their behavior, while others convincesthat student should take their responsibility for their performance. Personally, I’min favor of second one.

據(jù)權(quán)威報(bào)告，大學(xué)生的數(shù)量持續(xù)上漲，而質(zhì)量卻不如以前好。同時(shí)，表現(xiàn)不好的學(xué)生是否應(yīng)該不通過考試已經(jīng)有了很多的辯論？有的人認(rèn)為學(xué)校不應(yīng)該如此絕望，對(duì)學(xué)生的行為只是視而不見，而另一些人認(rèn)為學(xué)生應(yīng)該為他們的行為負(fù)責(zé)。就我個(gè)人而言，我支持第二個(gè)觀點(diǎn)。

Convince arguments can be madethat if school let all students pass the course, it will increase theirlaziness. To start with, students will not worry about being registered bydisciplinary inspector when they get up late. Therefore some of them will playcomputer games very late until midnight. Some students even don’t attend theclass and finish assignments. They hold a view on mind: even they get a lowscore on final exam, they still can pass it. Besides, some students do somepart-time jobs or join in student union but they can’t be the excuses forescaping learning.  Finally, if teachersget all students through the exam, it must be unfair to struggling students anddamage school's reputation.

使人信服的理由有，如果學(xué)校讓學(xué)生通過課程考試，會(huì)增加他們惰性。首先，學(xué)生們不用擔(dān)心起床晚了被紀(jì)律檢查員記名。因此，有一些人會(huì)玩電腦游戲玩到很晚，一直到午夜。甚至有些學(xué)生不上課，也不寫作業(yè)。他們堅(jiān)定的認(rèn)為：即使他們期末考試的時(shí)候分?jǐn)?shù)很低，他們?nèi)匀粫?huì)及格。此外，一些學(xué)生做一些兼職工作或參加學(xué)生會(huì)，但都不能作為逃避學(xué)習(xí)的借口。最后，如果教師讓所有的學(xué)生通過了考試，對(duì)那些努力學(xué)習(xí)的學(xué)生肯定是不公平的，也會(huì)損害學(xué)校的聲譽(yù)。

In summary, I would concede thatstudents who perform badly should be fail, as it makes students more lazy,damage school's reputation and unfair to the diligent students.

總之，我認(rèn)為那些表現(xiàn)不好的學(xué)生應(yīng)該不及格，因?yàn)檫@樣會(huì)使學(xué)生變得更懶，損害學(xué)校的聲譽(yù)而且對(duì)勤奮學(xué)習(xí)的學(xué)生不公平。