ted演講這幾年越來(lái)越火了，這是因?yàn)閠ed的演講確實(shí)很有深度，聽(tīng)ted的演講能夠讓人收獲到很多東西，也能讓我們認(rèn)真地去思考這個(gè)世界，我們是不是丟掉了一些很重要的東西？小編今天想要分享一篇萊溫斯基ted經(jīng)典演講稿給各位讀者,希望各位讀者能夠認(rèn)真地欣賞一下這個(gè)萊溫斯基ted經(jīng)典演講稿。

good morning,dear my friends.
You're looking at a woman who was publicly silent for a decade.Obviously,that's changed,but only recently.

It was several months ago that I gave my very first major public talk at the Forbes 30 Under 30 summit:1,500 brilliant people,all under the age of 30.That meant that in 1998,the oldest among the group were only 14,and the youngest,just four.I joked with them that some might only have heard of me from rap songs.Yes,I'm in rap songs.Almost 40 rap songs.

But the night of my speech,a surprising thing happened.At the age of 41,I was hit on by a 27-year-old guy.I know,right?He was charming and I was flattered,and I declined.You know what his unsuccessful pickup line was?He could make me feel 22 again.I realized later that night,I'm probably the only person over 40 who does not want to be 22 again.

At the age of 22,I fell in love with my boss,and at the age of 24,I learned the devastating consequences.

Can I see a show of hands of anyone here who didn't make a mistake or do something they regretted at 22?Yep.That's what I thought.So like me,at 22,a few of you may have also taken wrong turns and fallen in love with the wrong person,maybe even your boss.Unlike me,though,your boss probably wasn't the president of the United States of America.Of course,life is full of surprises.

Not a day goes by that I'm not reminded of my mistake,and I regret that mistake deeply.

This rush to judgment,enabled by technology,led to mobs of virtual stone-throwers.Granted,it was before social media,but people could still comment online,email stories,and,of course,email cruel jokes.News sources plastered photos of me all over to sell newspapers,banner ads online,and to keep people tuned to the TV.Do you recall a particular image of me,say,wearing a beret?

Now,I admit I made mistakes,especially wearing that beret.But the attention and judgment that I received,not the story,but that I personally received,was unprecedented.I was branded as a tramp,tart,slut,whore,bimbo,and,of course,that woman.I was seen by many but actually known by few.And I get it:it was easy to forget that that woman was dimensional,had a soul,and was once unbroken.

When this happened to me 17 years ago,there was no name for it.Now we call it cyberbullying(網(wǎng)絡(luò)欺凌)andonline harassment(網(wǎng)絡(luò)騷擾).Today,I want to share some of my experience with you,talk about how that experience has helped shape my cultural observations,and how I hope my past experience can lead to a change that results in less suffering for others.

This was not something that happened with regularity back then in 1998,and by this,I mean the stealing of people's private words,actions,conversations or photos,and then making them public--public without consent,public without context,and public without compassion.

Fast forward 12 years to 2010,and now social media has been born.The landscape has sadly become much more populated with instances like mine,whether or not someone actually make a mistake,and now it's for both public and private people.The consequences for some have become dire,very dire.

I was on the phone with my mom in September of 2010,and we were talking about the news of a young college freshman from Rutgers University named Tyler Clementi.Sweet,sensitive,creative Tyler was secretly webcammed by his roommate while being intimate with another man.When the online world learned of this incident,the ridicule and cyberbullying ignited.A few days later,Tyler jumped from the George Washington Bridge to his death.He was 18.

My mom was beside herself about what happened to Tyler and his family,and she was gutted with painin a way that I just couldn't quite understand,and then eventually I realized she was reliving 1998,reliving a time when she sat by my bed every night,reliving a time when she made me shower with the bathroom door open,and reliving a time when both of my parents feared that I would be humiliated to death,literally.

Cruelty to others is nothing new,but online,technologically enhanced shaming is amplified,uncontained,and permanently accessible.The echo of embarrassment used to extend only as far as your family,village,school or community,but now it's the online community too.Millions of people,often anonymously,can stab you with their words,and that's a lot of pain,and there are no perimeters around how many people can publicly observe you and put you in a public stockade.There is a very personal price to public humiliation,and the growth of the Internet has jacked up that price.

Changing behavior begins with evolving beliefs.We've seen that to be true with racism,homophobia,and plenty of other biases,today and in the past.As we've changed beliefs about same-sex marriage,more people have been offered equal freedoms.When we began valuing sustainability,more people began to recycle.So as far as our culture of humiliation goes,what we need is a cultural revolution.Public shaming as a blood sport has to stop,and it's time for an intervention on the Internet and in our culture.

The shift begins with something simple,but it's not easy.We need to return to a long-held value of compassion--compassion and empathy.Online,we've got a compassion deficit,an empathy crisis.

We talk a lot about our right to freedom of expression,but we need to talk more about our responsibility to freedom of expression.We all want to be heard,but let's acknowledge the difference between speaking up with intention and speaking up for attention.The Internet is the superhighway for the id,but online,showing empathy to others benefits us all and helps create a safer and better world.We need to communicate online with compassion,consume news with compassion,and click with compassion.Just imagine walking a mile in someone else's headline.I'd like to end on a personal note.In the past nine months,the question I've been asked the most is why.Why now?Why was I sticking my head above the parapet?You can read between the lines in those questions,and the answer has nothing to do with politics.

The top note answer was and is because it's time:time to stop tip-toeing around my past;time to stop living a life of opprobrium;and time to take back my narrative.It's also not just about saving myself.Anyone who is suffering from shame and public humiliation needs to know one thing:You can survive it.I know it's hard.It may not be painless,quick or easy,but you can insist on a different ending to your story.Have compassion for yourself.We all deserve compassion,and to live both online and off in a more compassionate world.

Thank you for listening.

親愛(ài)的朋友們:
早上好!

站在你們面前的這個(gè)女性曾在公眾面前沉默了十年。顯然,現(xiàn)在不一樣了,不過(guò)這只是最近的事。幾個(gè)月前在福布斯”30位30歲以下創(chuàng)業(yè)者”峰會(huì)上,我首次公開(kāi)發(fā)表演講,峰會(huì)上有1500位杰出人士,全部不到30歲。這就意味著在1998年,其中最年長(zhǎng)的人也只有14歲,最年輕的則只有4歲。我同他們開(kāi)玩笑,有些人似乎只是從說(shuō)唱音樂(lè)中聽(tīng)過(guò)我的名字。沒(méi)錯(cuò),說(shuō)唱音樂(lè)唱過(guò)我,幾乎有40首這樣的說(shuō)唱音樂(lè)。

在我演講當(dāng)晚意外的事情發(fā)生了,作為一個(gè)41歲的女性,竟然有一個(gè)27歲的小伙子勾搭我。我知道,難以相信吧?他很有魅力,說(shuō)了不少奉承的話,結(jié)果我拒絕了。知道他的搭訕不成功在哪嗎?他說(shuō)他能讓我感到又回到了22歲……那天晚上我意識(shí)到,40歲時(shí)不想回到22歲的人或許就只有我了。22歲時(shí),我愛(ài)上了我的老板,在24歲那年,我明白了其毀滅性的后果。

能否請(qǐng)大家舉手告訴我,如果你覺(jué)得自己22歲時(shí)沒(méi)有犯過(guò)錯(cuò),沒(méi)有做過(guò)讓自己后悔的事,請(qǐng)舉手?同我想的一樣,和我一樣,22歲那年,你們中的一些人大概也犯過(guò)錯(cuò),愛(ài)上過(guò)錯(cuò)誤的人,或許也正是你的老板。不過(guò)和我不同,你的老板八成不是美國(guó)總統(tǒng)。當(dāng)然,生活充滿了意外。每一天我都被提醒這個(gè)錯(cuò)誤,我每天都在深深后悔。

記得我那張照片嗎?戴著貝雷帽的那張?我承認(rèn),我犯了錯(cuò)誤,特別是不該戴那頂貝雷帽。在關(guān)注故事之外,人們對(duì)我個(gè)人的關(guān)注和道德審判也是前所未有的,我被打上各種標(biāo)簽蕩婦、妓女、母狗、婊子、賤人,當(dāng)然還有“那個(gè)女人”。很多人都看到了我,但很少有人了解我。我明白,人們很容易忘記一個(gè)女人是多維度的,其實(shí)她也有靈魂,也曾是完好無(wú)缺的。17年前,這些發(fā)生在我身上的事還沒(méi)有專(zhuān)門(mén)的名詞來(lái)稱(chēng)呼。現(xiàn)在,我們稱(chēng)之為網(wǎng)絡(luò)欺凌和線上騷擾。

快進(jìn)12年到2010年,社交媒體出現(xiàn)了,像我這樣的例子開(kāi)始越來(lái)越多,甚至無(wú)論當(dāng)事人有沒(méi)有犯錯(cuò)。而且公眾人物和普通人都深受其害,有些事件的結(jié)果非常悲慘。

2010年9月我和我媽打了一通電話,我們談到了一則新聞,關(guān)于羅格斯大學(xué)的一個(gè)大學(xué)新生。他叫泰勒·克萊門(mén)蒂——親切、靈敏、富有創(chuàng)造性的泰勒被室友偷拍到和另一個(gè)男的有親密行為,視頻被傳播到網(wǎng)上,嘲笑和網(wǎng)絡(luò)欺凌之火被點(diǎn)燃。幾天后,泰勒從喬治·華盛頓大橋縱身躍下……生命就這樣逝去……他只有18歲。

近二十年來(lái),我們逐漸在文化的土壤中,播下了羞辱和公開(kāi)侮辱的種子。無(wú)論是網(wǎng)上還是網(wǎng)下,八卦網(wǎng)站、狗仔隊(duì)、真人節(jié)目、政治、新聞報(bào)道甚至黑客,這些都是羞辱的渠道。麻木不仁、無(wú)孔不入的網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境讓網(wǎng)絡(luò)煽動(dòng)、隱私侵犯、網(wǎng)絡(luò)欺凌越來(lái)越猖獗。這種轉(zhuǎn)變創(chuàng)造出了尼古拉斯·米爾斯教授所說(shuō)的“羞辱文化”。

恥辱則變成了一種產(chǎn)業(yè)。如何賺錢(qián)呢?點(diǎn)擊。羞辱越多,點(diǎn)擊也就越多,點(diǎn)擊越多,廣告費(fèi)也越多。這是一個(gè)危險(xiǎn)的循環(huán)。我們對(duì)這些八卦點(diǎn)擊得越多,我們就會(huì)對(duì)故事背后的人越麻木,我們?cè)绞锹槟?就越會(huì)去點(diǎn)擊。自始至終,都是有些人在利用他人的痛苦在牟利,每一次點(diǎn)擊,我們都是在作出選擇。文化中充斥的公開(kāi)羞辱越多,越被接受,我們就會(huì)越多地看到網(wǎng)絡(luò)欺凌、網(wǎng)絡(luò)煽動(dòng)、黑客入侵,還有線上騷擾。為什么?因?yàn)樗鼈兊暮诵亩际切呷?這種行為成為了我們所創(chuàng)造的一種文化癥狀。

改變行為從改變信念開(kāi)始,無(wú)論是種族歧視還是同性戀歧視,現(xiàn)在和過(guò)去的很多歧視都是這樣來(lái)消除。隨著對(duì)同性婚姻觀念的改變,更多人被賦予了平等的自由。隨著對(duì)可持續(xù)性的倡導(dǎo),越來(lái)越多的人開(kāi)始回收利用。對(duì)于羞辱的文化也應(yīng)如此,我們需要文化革命,公開(kāi)羞辱這種流血的娛樂(lè)應(yīng)當(dāng)終止。無(wú)論是因特網(wǎng)上、還是文化中,現(xiàn)在都該干預(yù)了。

轉(zhuǎn)變可以從簡(jiǎn)單的事開(kāi)始,不過(guò)它本身并不簡(jiǎn)單。我們需要回歸人類(lèi)固有的一種價(jià)值,也就是同情心和同理心。網(wǎng)上正在經(jīng)歷同情心缺乏和同理心危機(jī)。引用研究者布琳·布朗的話,”羞辱在同理心下無(wú)法存活”。

我們經(jīng)常提到表達(dá)自由的權(quán)利,此外我們還應(yīng)該更多地談到我們?cè)诒磉_(dá)自由上的責(zé)任。我們都希望自己的聲音被聽(tīng)到,不過(guò)我們需要區(qū)分懷有意圖的發(fā)聲和請(qǐng)求關(guān)注的發(fā)聲,因特網(wǎng)是表達(dá)自我的超級(jí)高速公路。不過(guò)在網(wǎng)上換位思考他人處境對(duì)所有人都是有利的,而且能夠幫助創(chuàng)建更安全更美好的世界。我們需要懷著同情心在網(wǎng)上交流,懷著同情心閱讀新聞,懷著同情心點(diǎn)擊網(wǎng)站。

試想下自己活在別人的新聞?lì)^條里。

最后,我想以個(gè)人說(shuō)明作結(jié),過(guò)去九個(gè)月里我被問(wèn)得最多的問(wèn)題是為什么,為什么現(xiàn)在,為什么我要出這個(gè)頭。你們應(yīng)該可以聽(tīng)出這些問(wèn)題的言外之意。答案同政治無(wú)關(guān)。

我的回答是:因?yàn)槭菚r(shí)候了,是時(shí)候不再為過(guò)去而小心翼翼,是時(shí)候不再背負(fù)恥辱地活著,是時(shí)候講述自己的經(jīng)歷。這不僅僅是為了拯救我自己,任何遭受恥辱和公開(kāi)羞辱的人都需要知道一點(diǎn)——你能撐過(guò)來(lái),我知道這很難,肯定會(huì)有痛苦,肯定不會(huì)來(lái)得輕松容易。不過(guò)你能堅(jiān)持下去并書(shū)寫(xiě)出不同的故事結(jié)局。同情自己,我們都值得同情,無(wú)論線上還是線下,我們都需要生活在一個(gè)更富有同情心的世界。

謝謝聆聽(tīng)!

「標(biāo)簽: ted演講稿」